Kumke v. Best Kid Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 238, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 289, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Julius Kumke v. Best Kid Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 238, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 289, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Julius Kumke v. Best Kid Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. On motion of defendant the trial judge entered a non-suit. . The court in banc subsequently refused to take off the nonsuit in an opinion by Carr, J., as follows: . This was a suit brought by the plaintiff for the alleged negligence of the defendant by which he was employed. The accident happened on December 27,1910, between 3 and 4…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below dismissing the motion to take off the nonsuit.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Reynolds v. W. T. Grant Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Direnzo v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Brown v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951