Legal Opinion

Carr v. Smith.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 12, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

AotioN by J. S. Carr against J. W. Smith, heard by Judge W. B. Council and a jury, at March Term, 1901, of the S'u-perior Court of JDueham County. Erom a judgment for the' plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant certain amounts of money which he alleged he had paid for the defendant as a co-surety, the Golden Belt Hosiery Company being the principal debtor. The questions raised on the trial were, first, whether or not the defendant Smith was a supplemental surety or endorser to the plaintiff; and, if such, what amount did he owe the plaintiff %

On the cross-examination the defendant Smith,' a witness in his own behalf, was asked by plaintiff’s counsel if he did not tell Carr not to take into the business Carrington; that if they got…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Kramer v. Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Howell v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API