Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Bowen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1988No. 86-2188PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Woodrow and Audrey Patterson appeal from the district court’s order of summary judgment in this Social Security benefits dispute. Both the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) and the district court found that Woodrow Patterson, under Social Security law, is the father of an illegitimate child, Travis Zachary White, and accordingly decided that Travis was entitled to child’s insurance benefits on Woodrow Patterson’s wage earner’s account. We hold that substantial evidence supports the district court’s findings and affirm.

The Pattersons are married. Mr.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mary J. Cunningham v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. Marjorie Vance and Reginald Ham v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Distefano v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. McMILLIAN v. HECKLERCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Eaton v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. Patterson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Mack ex rel. Wesley v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  4. AUSTIN v. O'MALLEYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  5. Absher v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API