Legal Opinion

Cerullo v. Cerullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1972No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Paragraph 12 of the land contract sought to be enforced permits the vendor to extinguish the rights of the vendee only upon the obtaining of a final order in a summary dispossess proceeding. Since plaintiff as vendor under a land contract cannot maintain such a proceeding (see 16 Carmody-Wait 2d, Hew York Practice, § 98.5), we find nothing in the language of paragraph 12 which would éntitle plaintiff to extinguish the rights of the vendee upon failure to pay installments due. The contract does not provide…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hinman v. Hinman, New York County Courts1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API