Legal Opinion

United States v. Hana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1921No. 3727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Action by the United States against Olaf O. Hana. Judgment for defendant, and the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Some liquor, wine and beer, was brought into the port of Seattle on the ship Eovejoy, arriving from a foreign port, and Hana, the master, failed to include the articles in the manifest filed with the authorities. The government brought action under Rev. St. §■ 2809 (Comp. St. § 5506). General demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and to review judgment of dismissal the United States brought writ of error.

In United States v. Sischo (C. C. A.) 270 Fed. 958, it was held in effect that the master of a ship is not liable for the penalty imposed by section 2809, R. S. U. S.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SischoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bookbinder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  2. Moyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. 1,250 Cases of LiquorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  4. United States v. SantiniCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API