Ruckert v. Bursley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Max Ruckert, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York oh the 5th day of March, 1900, as provides that all questions as to the sufficiency, responsiveness or relevancy of the plaintiff’s answers on cross-examination, taken under a commission issued in the action, be reserved to be disposed of on the trial of the issues in the action.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The notice of motion in this case asked for a re-execution of a commission directed to a party in Cros S chon an, in Saxony, for the reason that he had failed to answer certain cross-interrogatories. The affidavit upon which the motion was based specified such fact, and certain questions and answers which form a part of the deposition were set out and form a part of this record. Mo affidavits were read in opposition. The court denied the motion and made an order that all questions as to the sufficiency, responsiveness or relevancy of the plaintiff’s answers on cross-examination…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Square Bank v. ReichmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896