Legal Opinion
Coulson v. DeAngelo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 10, 1986No. 85-1790PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
493 So.2d 98 (1986)
James T. COULSON, Appellant,
v.
Anthony DeANGELO, et al., Appellees.
No. 85-1790.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 10, 1986.
Peter Mineo, Jr. and Angelo Marino, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
James B. Hamlin and Delissa A. Ridgway of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, Washington, D.C., and Paul C. Huck of Fleming & Huck, Miami, for appellee Intern. Armament Corp.
2Per curiam
Affirmed. We reject the appellant's contention that the trial court erred in dismissing his claims against a gun manufacturer for failure to state a cause of action. Trespalacios v.…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Trespalacios v. Valor Corp. of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by9 opinions
- Tanya Copier, Deceased, by and Through Bree Renee Lindsey, Her Personal Representative v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- LEGGETT GROUP, INC. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Delahanty v. HinckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Penelas v. Arms Technology, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Richardson v. HollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.