Legal Opinion

Solemene v. Solemene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The continued existence of the separation agreement bars the granting of this motion. It does not satisfactorily appear in this record that the defendant breached the agreement or that the agreement did not subsist at the time of the commencement of this action. (Rosenblatt v. Rosenblatt, 209 App. Div. 373; Drane v. Drane, 207 id. 217; Brody v. Brody, 190 id. 806; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 id. 221; Beebe v. Beebe, 174 id. 408; Johnson v. Johnson,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Rosenblatt v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  2. Lebolt v. LeboltNew York Family Court · 1951
  3. Krell v. KrellNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Adams v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API