Legal Opinion
Fred Kyle v. Jack Hanberry and Norman Carlson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 11, 1982No. 80-7974PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
In a petition for habeas corpus relief, Fred Kyle alleged that an administrative determination by the Inmate Disciplinary Committee (“IDC”) at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary was arbitrary and capricious and violated his constitutional right of due process and that a determination by the IDC at the Lewisburg Federal Penitentiary violated his due process and first amendment rights. The district court, acting upon the recommendation of a magistrate, entered summary judgment in favor of the respondent government officials. We reverse and remand for further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Charles Smith v. Fulton Rabalais, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Douglas Gomes v. Anthony P. Travisono, Etc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Helms v. HewittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ruben Ramirez Sanchez v. H.G. Miller, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Kevin Richardson v. Donald Selsky, Clement Capuano, William Fenton, Bernard LonczakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Redding v. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Cato v. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.