Legal Opinion
Austin Bridge Co. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 14, 1977No. 5675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs Austin Bridge Company, and other bridge fabricators, from judgment decreeing no liability, in their suits against defendant State of Texas, for alleged losses suffered for being required by defendant to repaint steel bridge members.
Plaintiffs alleged they entered contracts with the State of Texas to construct steel bridges on highway construction jobs; that the paint specified in each contract was “740 paint”; that 740 paint was originated and developed by the Texas Highway Department; that the State sold the paint; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- State of Texas v. Martin Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Dallas v. ShortallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Plantation Foods, Inc. v. R. J. Reagan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Westech Engineering, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Ghr Energy Corporation, Southern States Exploration, Inc., and S.A. Holditch & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- NL Industries, Inc. v. GHR Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- NL Industries, Inc. v. GHR Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Westech Engineering, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc., a Division of Phelps, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992