Legal Opinion

The Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company v. Mann Overall Company, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 5, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 141 USPQ 934, adhered to on rehearing, dismissing appellant’s opposition (No. 39,-765) to registration of GOLDEN HORSESHOE and granting appellee’s counterclaim to cancel appellant’s registration of HORSE SHOE, one of two registrations relied on by appellant in the opposition.

The following are the four salient facts involved, stated in chronological order:

1. The trademark “HORSESHOE” COLLAR (in rectangular box) was registered, No. 349,826, Sept. 7, 1937, to a predecessor in title of appellant for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGovern v. MartzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  2. Turkett v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1948
  3. Anno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Pink Lady Corporation v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. Walker v. PilkertonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashland Licensing & Intellectual Property LLC v. Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API