Legal Opinion
Borough of Paulsboro v. Essex Chemical Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 16, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SKILLMAN, J.A.D.
(retired and temporarily assigned on recall).
In Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v. Suydam Investors, L.L.C., 177 N.J. 2, 23-24, 826 A.2d 673 (2003), the Court held that contaminated property acquired in an eminent domain action must be valued as if the contamination had been remediated *126and that the portion of the condemnation award required to pay the costs of remediation should be deposited into a trust-escrow account. The question presented by this appeal is whether this special methodology for valuing contaminated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Town of Kearny v. Discount City of Old Bridge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Cat in Hat, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finderne Engine Co. v. Morgan Trucking Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Mary FrancoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- GGI Props., LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Props., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2018