Legal Opinion

Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 2001No. Nos. C1-01-278, C4-01-291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge

The district court denied appellants motion for summary judgment on respondents claim against appellant minister for negligent counseling. Appellants challenge this decision, asserting that the district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Because resolution of the claim would result in excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment, we reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Steven Odenthal and his then-wife Diane were members of the Minnetonka Seventh-Day Adventist Church. The couple sought marital counseling from their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Odenthal v. MN CONF. OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENT.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API