Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge
The district court denied appellants motion for summary judgment on respondents claim against appellant minister for negligent counseling. Appellants challenge this decision, asserting that the district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Because resolution of the claim would result in excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment, we reverse.
FACTS
Respondent Steven Odenthal and his then-wife Diane were members of the Minnetonka Seventh-Day Adventist Church. The couple sought marital counseling from their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Odenthal v. MN CONF. OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENT.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001