Brottman v. Schela
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
BeoNSON, Oh. L.
This is an action to reform a contract and to enjoin defendant from engaging in the grocery business at a certain location in Devils Lake, North Dakota. . Defendant has appealed from the judgment and demands a trial de novo in this court.
The facts necessary to be stated are: — The defendant owned two lots and a store building situated on what is known as the West Side in the city of Devils Lake, N. D. There for about one year and two months he had conducted a grocery business. Plaintiff, previous to the grocery business so maintained by defendant, apparently had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mapes v. MetcalfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Prescott v. BidwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Siegel v. MarcusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bessel v. BethkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949