Legal Opinion

Brottman v. Schela

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

BeoNSON, Oh. L.

This is an action to reform a contract and to enjoin defendant from engaging in the grocery business at a certain location in Devils Lake, North Dakota. . Defendant has appealed from the judgment and demands a trial de novo in this court.

The facts necessary to be stated are: — The defendant owned two lots and a store building situated on what is known as the West Side in the city of Devils Lake, N. D. There for about one year and two months he had conducted a grocery business. Plaintiff, previous to the grocery business so maintained by defendant, apparently had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mapes v. MetcalfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Prescott v. BidwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Siegel v. MarcusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Bessel v. BethkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API