Legal Opinion

City of Stanberry v. O'Neal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Gentry Circuit Court. — Eon. W. G. Ellison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

— The defendant was charged with a violation of an ordinance of the city of Stanberry. The judgment in the circuit court, on appeal, was for the defendant. The city thereupon brought the case here.

The question presented is whether iu a prosecution for the violation of a municipal ordinance inflicting a punishment of imprisonment in jail for six months, or a fine of $200, or both, for disturbing the *710peace by loud and indecent conversation and quarrel-ling and fighting, it is proper to instruct the jury in the circuit court that the defendant must be believed to be guilty beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. City of St. Louis v. WeitzelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Ex parte HollwedellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. Kansas City v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Ulrich v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Brunner v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Kansas City v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Village of Marble Hill v. CaldwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API