Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Wilson v. Knox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal oy tlie defendants, Charles H. Knox and otners, composing the- municipal civil service commission of the city of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, bearing date the 10th day of October, 1899, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, granting the relator’s motion for a ueremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.‘:

This appeal is from an order granting a writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of a certiticate under section 19 of chapter 3 TO of the Laws of 1899. - There -is a radical difference between this ease and that of Chamberlain, decided herewith (ante, p. 518). Here, *538the relator was origipally appointed a police clerk’s assistant by thé hoard of city magistrates, on; the 28th; day of. ¡February.,--:1;89.9., to fill the pnexpired ■term-'o£ ¿^deceased prior ■ .incumbent, which term extended-to'.and endedeh the SOth.of: June, 1899. That appointment was made pursuant to the Civil…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Walton v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Halligan v. RunkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re DowlingNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People ex rel. Metz v. LantryNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McLoughlin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API