Legal Opinion

People v. Sambrano

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1939No. Crim. No. 1672PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, Acting P. J.

The defendant was charged with the murder of Fortunado Jiminez, and with a former conviction of another felony. The defendant admitted the former conviction and the jury found him guilty of murder of the first degree, recommending a penalty of life imprisonment.

The appellant contends the verdict is not supported by the evidence; that there is no evidence of a motive for the murder; that the court erred in admitting and rejecting testimony, and in the instructions which were given to the jury and refused. It is also asserted the district attorney was guilty of prejudicial misconduct in his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. ConnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. State v. RiggleWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. BundteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API