Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Duhon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1990No. CA 89 1339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOTTINGER, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is one of prescription. Mrs. Hazel Bernard filed suit on August 11, 1987 against various defendants to recover for her personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on September 27, 1984. The trial court sustained defendants’ peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription. Mrs. Bernard *162has appealed, asserting that her petition is in fact an intervention, and as such it was timely filed within the ninety day period allowed by La.Code Civ.P. art. 1067 for filing incidental demands.

FACTS

On…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foster v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Randall v. FeduciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Odessa House v. GossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Moraus v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Humphries v. LA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIV. OF TRANSP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Gencorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Bernard v. DuhonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API