Legal Opinion

Prompt Electrical Supply Co. v. W. E. Tatem, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Brennan, Jr., J.

The plaintiff in this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien moves to dismiss separate defenses pleaded in the respective answers of the general contractor (Layne) and of the surety (American) upon its undertaking filed to discharge the lien. The litigation arises out of a public improvement contract pursuant to which Layne constructed and installed a water pumping station for the defendant Village of Hempstead. The plaintiff sold and delivered electrical supplies and equipment to one of Layne’s subcontractors, the defendant Tatem, for which it has not been paid.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Triple Cities Construction Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Albany Builders' Supply Co. v. Eastern Bridge & Structural Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Falk v. MacMastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. McGowan v. McGowanNew York Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riland v. Frederick S. Todman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Meenan Oil Co. v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API