Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Rankin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 2018No. 23A18Published

1Dissent

Chief Justice MARTIN dissenting.

I write separately to discuss the significant failings of the jurisdictional approach the majority uses to evaluate the sufficiency of criminal indictments. Taking my cue from United States v. Cotton , 535 U.S. 625, 122 S.Ct. 1781, 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002), the time has come to reconsider this antiquated approach to flawed indictments in light of the extensive statutory, constitutional, and conceptual changes in criminal procedure during the twentieth century. Moreover, the General Assembly may wish to consider revisions to our criminal code to lessen the…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API