Hubbell v. Palmer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Sometime prior to July, 1873, plaintiffs commenced an action in the circuit court of Wayne county against Charles H. Palmer, to recover for professional services.
The claim made in the present action is that on July 22, 1873, in consideration of the promises made by Charles H. Palmer to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $3,000 within 30 days from that date, the first mentioned suit was discontinued, and this action is brought in the Oakland circuit court to recover that sum, with interest from that date.
This suit was commenced against Charles H. Palmer in his life-time, but, he having died…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Morse v. Tillotson & Wolcott Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Bollenbacher v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Stuart v. Home Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Carmichael v. Schaefer Heights Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Athol Manfg. Co. v. Briscoe Motor Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923