Legal Opinion
Scinta v. Van Coevering
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs’ medical malpractice action has been before us on two prior appeals. In the first appeal, defendants, Kathleen J. Van Coevering, Administratrix of the Estate of Russell J. Van Coevering, II, M.D., deceased (Estate) and Sisters of Charity Hospital (Hospital), appealed from an order compelling an in camera inspection of decedent’s medical and psychiatric records for two years before the alleged malpractice, and directing the Hospital to submit its quality…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Scinta v. Van CoeveringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Mong v. Children's Hospital of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- JOUSMA, THOMAS P. v. KOLLI, DR. VENKATESWARA R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Robinson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Meyer v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Meyer v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Meyer v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.