Legal Opinion

Manos v. Day Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1952No. 4243PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

An appeal on questions of law and fact from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County places this litigation for trial de novo in this court.

As stated by the trial judge in the Court of Common Pleas:

“The'plaintiff has two causes of action.
“The first cause of action is to prevent the defendant from building an edifice that would occupy the defendant’s property from property line to property line. It is claimed that the plaintiff has an easement over the erstwhile driveway that ran along the north side of the defendant’s land and within two feet of the building on the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Snyder v. Warde, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pierce v. Cherry Valley Farms, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Pierce v. Cherry Valley Farms, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. J. F. Gioia, Inc. v. Cardinal American Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cadwallader v. ScovannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Hindall v. MartinezOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Chaconas v. MeyersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. McInnish v. SibitOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API