Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Seigel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 3, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

In response to an amended complaint in contract in which the plaintiff, Maurice Epstein, seeks to recover $3,000, which was the amount of a check, dated July 29, 1968, drawn by the defendant, Benjamin Seigel, to the plaintiff’s order, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6), 365 Mass. 754 (1974), specifically interposing the statute of limitations as a bar to recovery. A judge in the District Court allowed the motion to dismiss and reported his order of dismissal to the Appellate Division, which dismissed the report. The plaintiff appealed from the order of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillingham v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Custy v. DonlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Woodcock v. American Investment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Wenz v. WenzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Wald v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whitehall Co. v. Merrimack Valley Distributing Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Rosbeck v. Corin Group, PLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  3. Driscoll v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Cambridge Biotech Corp. v. Deliotte & ToucheMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  5. Moda v. Terminex International Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API