Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Remet

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1995No. 95-62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The issue before us is whether the Trial Court erroneously declined to award attorney’s fees. Robert Clayton Wynn, the appellant, contends he was entitled to attorney’s fee awards pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-309 (Repl. 1994) because there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised in counterclaims against him by Robert R Remet and John Lewis McGehee, the appellees. In accordance with subsection (d) of the statute, we have reviewed the record de novo, and we agree with Mr. Wynn; therefore, we reverse the Trial Court’s decision and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Harmon v. Carco Carriage Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Lawson v. SippleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Routh Wrecker Service, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Sexton Law Firm, P.A. v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Hamilton v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Thompson v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Hearne v. Diane BanksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API