Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 2013No. 1D13-1136Published

1Per curiam

LaDaniel Lee petitions this Court for relief due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In the direct appeal following Lee’s conviction for robbery with a weapon, his attorney failed to raise a meritorious, preserved argument as to which we granted his codefendant relief in Collier v. State, — So.3d - (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In this case, the failure to raise the issue meets the deficiency prong of the Strickland1 test. See Cupon v. State, 833 So.2d 302, 304-05 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Further, the Collier opinion establishes that the result of Lee’s appeal would have been different if the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cupon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API