Legal Opinion
Maddox v. Hollums
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 11, 1922No. 2570PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). Article 7103, R. S., provides:
“When property has been sequestered, the defendant shall have the right to retain possession of the same by delivering to the officer executing the writ his bond, payable to the plaintiff, with two or more good and sufficient sureties, to be approved by such officer, for an amount of money not less than double the value of the property to be replevied.”
Article 7105, R. S., provides:
“If the property be real estate, the condition of such bond shall be that the defendant will not injure the property, and that he will pay the value…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Erskine ex rel. HangerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Wooters v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Colorado City National Bank v. Lester & HazzardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Jacobs v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Leona I., M. & C. Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Abilene Livestock Auction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1945