Legal Opinion

Kloths v. Hess

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson county: B. F. Dunwiddie, Circuit Judge. Action of slander for utterance by defendant of the words: “That child [the dead child of AVilliam and Mary Kittel meaning] has been murdered. The woman you had here [the plaintiff meaning] murdered itand, as a second cause of action,' the words: “A murder has been committed oyer at Kittel’s. That old lady [the plaintiff meaning] goes around with her grip.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson county: B. F. Dunwiddie, Circuit Judge. Action of slander for utterance by defendant of the words: “That child [the dead child of AVilliam and Mary Kittel meaning] has been murdered. The woman you had here [the plaintiff meaning] murdered itand, as a second cause of action,' the words: “A murder has been committed oyer at Kittel’s. That old lady [the plaintiff meaning] goes around with her grip. She ought to be stopped. The child [the dead child of William and Mary meaning] was' murdered, and she [this plaintiff meaning] did it.” There…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

An objection to any evidence under the complaint was made, apparently on the contention that the words-in the complaint “the dead child of William and Mary meaning,” assert that the child was born dead. Such meaning is-so obviously foreign to the whole sense that no discussion is necessary. The words, by reasonable interpretation, mean that the child was dead at the time the defendant made the-charge.

It is contended that the motion for nonsuit should have-been granted: Eirst, because the hearers knew that the child was born dead; secondly, because the exact words alleged in the complaint are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BorcheniusIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hacker v. HeineyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Templeton v. GravesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Thibault v. SessionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Dufresne v. WeiseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Earley v. WinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hyde v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Greeler v. RedmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. M v. JWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API