Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Schaaf

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1975No. 58671PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition, involving a double jeopardy question. Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435 (1970) held that a municipal ordinance conviction bars a subsequent state prosecution for the same offense. The state seeks to avoid this doctrine on the ground that the municipal conviction in this case was allegedly procured by collusion.

Petitioner, defendant in the felony case pending before respondent, seeks to prohibit any further proceeding therein. We issued our provisional rule, which we now make absolute.

*60The facts come from…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Jetz Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. CodySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. State v. RotterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Bullington v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State v. WeideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API