State v. McQueen
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the trial court's decision to grant defendant-appellee, Michael McQueen's ("McQueen"), motion to suppress. We affirm.
{¶ 2} McQueen was charged with one count of having weapons while under disability, a third-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) ; one count of improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle, a fourth-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.16(B) ; one count of receiving stolen property, a fourth-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2913.51(A) ; and one count of carrying a concealed weapon,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McQueenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018