Legal Opinion

State v. McQueen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2018No. 106418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the trial court's decision to grant defendant-appellee, Michael McQueen's ("McQueen"), motion to suppress. We affirm.

{¶ 2} McQueen was charged with one count of having weapons while under disability, a third-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) ; one count of improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle, a fourth-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.16(B) ; one count of receiving stolen property, a fourth-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2913.51(A) ; and one count of carrying a concealed weapon,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McQueenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API