Legal Opinion
American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 19, 1981No. Civ. 81-0171PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs filed this action alleging violations of their constitutional rights and of rights granted by Pennsylvania law. Jurisdiction is alleged to arise under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 and the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction. Contemporaneously with the filing of the complaint the Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. A brief in support of the motion was filed on February 13, 1981 and an opposing brief was filed on February 27,1981. The Plaintiffs have chosen not to file a reply brief. For the following reasons, the motion for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. State University of New York CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.