Blood v. Robinson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
In this case, which was a writ of error, argued by Ed. G. Loring, for the plaintiffs, and D. A. Simmons, for the defendant, the facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.
In error from a judgment of the court of common pleas for this county, January term, 1845, on a report *390of arbitrators under a justice’s rule. It appears by the record, that the submission was made in the usual form (as provided in the statute) to three arbitrators, and that the award was made and signed by two of them only. The award was then recommitted by the court to the arbitrators, to certify whether they were all present at the hearing and adjudication, without a rehearing of the parties upon the merits. Thereupon, at the same term, the same award was returned, with a certificate of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitney v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- May v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Boardman v. EnglandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Zephyr Construction Co. & Boro Hall Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Kittredge v. Kittredge Holdings, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002