Logue v. Rouse

We find no error apparent upon the face of the record except in the charge of the court. The court charged the jury as follows :

“There was no evidence that the plaintiff, Mrs. Rouse, had anything to do with the operation, management and control of the Rouse car at the time and place in question, and in such circumstances, even though she may have owned the car, yet she could not be charged with any negligence of which her husband may have been guilty, if any, in his operation, management and control of the car.”

The court also charged as follows:

“The mere relation of husband and wife does not…