Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Lapp
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentHorowitz, J.
(dissenting) — This case considers the remedy available under Washington law for a creditor of a married person who has signed a promissory note for payment of a debt incurred for the sole benefit of his noncom-munity property. The trial court reached the correct result in refusing to hold the Lapp marital community liable on this note signed only by Mr. Lapp in Colorado with respect to and for the benefit of his noncommunity property. I therefore must dissent from the majority's reversal of the Court of Appeals decision upholding the trial court's dismissal of Pacific Gamble's claim against…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- deElche v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Potlatch No. 1 Federal Credit Union v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.