Legal Opinion

Haberlach v. Tillamook County Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Prior to the amendment of section 3, article XI of the Oregon Constitution, which amendment went into effect on November 29, 1912, the Tillamook County Bank was organized and plaintiff subscribed for 37 shares of its capital stock and paid the par value thereof in cash. Under its articles of incorporation the bank had an authorized capital stock of $75,000, divided into 750 shares of the par value of $100. When the bank was organized and plaintiff became a stockholder thereof, section 3 of article XI of the state constitution provided that:

“The stockholders of all corporations and joint stock…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. The Binghamton BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schramm v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Schramm v. DoneOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Seaborn v. WingfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wickham v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API