Legal Opinion

McTighe v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1909No. Appeal, No. 197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 197, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1907, No. 860, on bill in equity in case of J. McTighe v. Abe Schwartz. Bill in equity for an injunction. Macfarlane, J., filed the following opinion: FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. On March 1, 1907, an ordinance of the city of Pittsburg was passed and approved, a true copy of which is attached to the plaintiff’s bill.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 197, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1907, No. 860, on bill in equity in case of J. McTighe v. Abe Schwartz. Bill in equity for an injunction. Macfarlane, J., filed the following opinion: FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. On March 1, 1907, an ordinance of the city of Pittsburg was passed and approved, a true copy of which is attached to the plaintiff’s bill. It was provided that thereafter the stalls and stands in the Diamond Market shall be leased for a term of three years from the first Monday of May, 1907, and every three years thereafter.…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The decree is affirmed on the findings of fact and the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Semple v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API