Legal Opinion

Shank v. . Shoemaker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1859PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeal from Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtS. B. Strong, J.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal in this action on several grounds, of which I deem it necessary to consider the following, only: That the action has been settled by an agreement between the defendant, with the consent of his sureties on the appeal, and the attorney for the plaintiffs. The terms of the settlement are not stated in the respondents’ papers, but it is to be inferred from the affidavit of the attorney for the appellant, that the sureties of the defendant, who is insolvent, paid the respondents’ costs, and the respondents remitted the penalties for which they had…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pulver v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Henchey v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Kusterer v. City of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. McMichael v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API