Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination finding petitioner guilty of refusing to obey a direct order (see, 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]). At petitioner’s Tier III hearing, the Hearing Officer erred in refusing to receive or consider evidence that petitioner acted out of genuine concern for his safety (see, Matter of De Mauro v LeFevre, 91 AD2d 1156). It is well established that "evidence of justification or mitigating circumstances is relevant in a prison disciplinary proceeding” (Matter of De Mauro v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Mauro v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Wilson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Bole v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API