Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Goldstein

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1922No. 6 Div. 926Published

1Dissent

As provided by statute (Acts 1911, p. 449; 1 Ala. App. 10), the Court of Appeals certifies to this court the abstract question of the constitutionality of the act approved September 30, 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 1088).

Is the act violative of the Tenth or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, or of sections 6, 7, or 22 of the Constitution of Alabama?

The act for construction is entitled "An act to define trusts, monopolies, combines, profiteering and unlawful acts in hoarding, cornering or storing commodities with the purpose and intent to probably influence the price of…

2Cases cited148 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API