Legal Opinion

Chambers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1934No. 7 Div. 84PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The appeal is on the record without a bill of exceptions.

The point is made that the sentence for the fine and costs is void.

Section 3883 of the Code of 1923 provides as a punishment for public drunkenness as therein defined a fine: “To be paid in money only.” This does not mean that the defendant may not be sentenced to hard labor if he fail or refuse to pay the fine. The statute requiring the payment to be made in money only is to guard against payment in depreciated fine and forfeiture claims issued by the county or other depreciated medium. The requirement that the fine be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte Joice & SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Chambers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API