Strubing v. Mahar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from Niagara county court. Action by Charles Strubing against Patrick Mahar. From a judgment of nonsuit, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
Plaintiff commenced this action in justice’s court in September, 1898. A trial was had in that court before the justice and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $50 damages. The defendant appealed to the county court, where a new trial was had.
Plaintiff’s complaint states that he is the father of Hedwig Strubing, a daughter, some 10 years of age; and the complaint alleges that the defendant on the 17th of March, 1898, “and for several years prior thereto, harbored and kept a large, ferocious, vicious, and dangerous dog, whose disposition was to attack human beings,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Briggs v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Quilty v. . BattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Van Leuven v. Lyke & DumondNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Vrooman v. LawyerNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Earl v. Van AlstineNew York Supreme Court · 1850
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grummel v. DeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940