Legal Opinion

Eckes v. Richland County Social Services

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2001No. 20000142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Roland Eckes, personal representative of the estate of Hattie Hillestad, appeals the district court’s affirmation of the decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), adopted as the final order by the Department of Human Services (“Department”), disqualifying Hillestad from Medicaid benefits because assets of a residuary trust, of which she was a beneficiary, were “available” for the purpose of determining eligibility for Medicaid. We hold the Department erred in construing the intent of Hillestad’s deceased husband to allow Hil-lestad to invade the trust principal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Stark County Social Service BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wahl v. Morton County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Martin v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bohac v. GrahamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kryzsko v. Ramsey County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Estate of MansfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pohlmann Ex Rel. Pohlmann v. Nebraska Department of Health & Human ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. New Town Public School District No. 1 v. State Board of Public School Education of State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API