Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Connell v. Kavanagh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 24, 1997Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm.

While McGee v Adams Paper & Twine Co. (26 AD2d 186, 195, affd 20 NY2d 921) may not require a showing of the same degree of proximate cause as in a common-law negligence cause of action, it still requires a showing of a "practical or reasonable connection” between the violation, and the injury sustained.

In Lusenskas v Axelrod (183 AD2d 244, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 300), a case in which the sole issue was constructive notice to the landlord of the violation not causation, there was a sufficient causal connection established where the lack of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transportation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. McGee v. Adams Paper & Twine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. McGee v. Adams Paper & Twine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Lusenskas v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Walsh v. Staten Island Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API