Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided August 8, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-156-JWD-EWDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The first matter comes before the Court on two motions: (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 12) filed by Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company ("USAA" or "Defendant"), and (2) the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) filed by Plaintiff Donovan Hinkle ("Hinkle" or "Plaintiff"). Both motions are opposed (Docs. 16, 17.) Oral argument is not necessary. The Court has carefully considered the law, facts in the record, and arguments and submissions of the parties and is prepared to rule. For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doucet-Speer, APLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Doucet-Speer, APLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025