Legal Opinion
Lin Guo Xi v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Opinion
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2002No. 01-35867PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
Just a year ago the Supreme Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) “limits an alien’s post-removal-period detention” to a reasonable time period and “does not permit indefinite detention” by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). *834Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). We are now presented with the question of whether this statute bears the same meaning for an individual deemed inadmissible to the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1182. The answer is yes. Our analysis of § 1231(a)(6) begins and ends with Zad-vydas.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. James HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Adam Pelich v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Adele J. Fasano, District Director, for the San Diego DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.