Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Safian

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1978Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFuchsberg, J.

The majority ignores the principle, so simply and forcefully put by the late Justice Hugo Black, that "[b]ad men, like good men, are entitled to be tried and sentenced in accordance with law” (Green v United States, 365 US 301, 309). As we read the record, David Safian, like him or not, did not get a fair trial. When that happens to anyone in our society, the rights of all are diminished. Therefore, though the entire court agrees that Robert Miner’s conviction of murder should stand, my fellow dissenters and I believe Safian is entitled to a new trial.

Inescapable prejudice to Safian was bound…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. People v. FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API