Legal Opinion

State v. Briscoe

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 23, 1993No. 74910PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIMBAUGH, Judge.

The State of Missouri appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining defendant Orlando L. Briscoe’s Rule 29.15 motion to vacate his convictions under § 195.-020, RSMo 1986 (repealed), 1 of three counts of sale of cocaine. We accepted transfer to review the issue raised in the Rule 29.15 motion — whether the failure to recite in the information that defendant acted “knowingly” in the commission of the offenses is a fatal defect. The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

Defendant Briscoe’s challenge to the sufficiency of the information, first raised in the Rule 29.15…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. IsaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  4. United States v. Charles Naylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. State v. RousseauMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API