Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1ConcurrenceLeben, J.
I join fully in the analysis and holdings of the excellent opinion Justice Luckert has written for the court. I write separately, however, to express my respectful disagreement with a statement regarding the interpretation of statutes that has found its way into the court’s recent cases — a statement that is contrary to the long tradition of statutory interpretation in Kansas and to the most thoughtful views of scholars in the area.
In its opinion, the court says that when an initial look at a statute’s words reveals no ambiguity, the court will not use the tools of statutory interpretation or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.