Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Workman v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBirch, Justice

On March 20, 1982, a jury convicted Philip R. Workman of first degree murder and thereafter imposed a sentence of death. Since then, the conviction and sentence have together been reviewed to the fullest extent allowable under state and federal procedural guidelines. Even in the face of this withering scrutiny, however, the conviction and sentence continue in force as then imposed.

Given the state of the record, there exists, in my view, no procedure, no method, no means by which the conviction or the sentence or the process through which they were produced can be further tested or scrutinized…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. BectonTennessee Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Green v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Porter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API