People v. Washington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated February 2, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his designation as a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing ev*909idence (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WindhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ReedeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. ReedeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014