Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated February 2, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his designation as a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing ev*909idence (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. WindhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ReedeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. ReedeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API